<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CD remasters &#8211; what&#8217;s been your most disappointing &#8211; and your best?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cochrane</title>
		<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cochrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/musicclub/?p=449#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>My biggest remastering delight ever has been The Beatles stereo remasters - the monos are good too, but for me the stereos are nicer.  As I said in a comment elsewhere, I was relieved that all the dynamics of the original masters have been retained, so the music lives and breathes and moves freely without constraint. I would say the same of Miles Davis&#039;s Kind Of Blue 50th Anniversary remaster too.  Delightfully warm and dynamic, a joy to hear coming from my B+W speakers!
My biggest disappointment: the Genesis stereo remixes, released in 2007.  After all that waiting and anticipation, the sound was just horrible.  LOUD in-your-face over-processed sound from start to finish - too heavy on the warm harmonics (obviously added to counter the coldness of digital media) to the point of sounding distorted - with a tiny dynamic range (even worse than Gabriel&#039;s later output) that makes one come over all claustrophobic. I will say that the vinyl remasters sound very good, particularly Foxtrot, mainly due to the very tasteful compression applied. But as for the stereo CDs - forget it.  Too flat and lifeless. Awful! Probably no worse than most masters these days though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest remastering delight ever has been The Beatles stereo remasters &#8211; the monos are good too, but for me the stereos are nicer.  As I said in a comment elsewhere, I was relieved that all the dynamics of the original masters have been retained, so the music lives and breathes and moves freely without constraint. I would say the same of Miles Davis&#8217;s Kind Of Blue 50th Anniversary remaster too.  Delightfully warm and dynamic, a joy to hear coming from my B+W speakers!<br />
My biggest disappointment: the Genesis stereo remixes, released in 2007.  After all that waiting and anticipation, the sound was just horrible.  LOUD in-your-face over-processed sound from start to finish &#8211; too heavy on the warm harmonics (obviously added to counter the coldness of digital media) to the point of sounding distorted &#8211; with a tiny dynamic range (even worse than Gabriel&#8217;s later output) that makes one come over all claustrophobic. I will say that the vinyl remasters sound very good, particularly Foxtrot, mainly due to the very tasteful compression applied. But as for the stereo CDs &#8211; forget it.  Too flat and lifeless. Awful! Probably no worse than most masters these days though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/musicclub/?p=449#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>I know several people who say the same about Born to Run but while there&#039;s certainly plenty going on on that record maybe Bruce wasn&#039;t interested in revealing &#039;hitherto unheard complexities in recording&#039;. I read an interview where he said he wanted his records  to sound like Gary Bonds&#039; &#039;Quarter to Three&#039; - like they were recorded in a bathroom on the moon and nearly drowned out by the house party going on outside the door. If an artist&#039;s ideal sound quality is that of his youth - crappy car radios, cheap portables and muddy pa&#039;s in local bars - then maybe remastering isnt really relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know several people who say the same about Born to Run but while there&#8217;s certainly plenty going on on that record maybe Bruce wasn&#8217;t interested in revealing &#8216;hitherto unheard complexities in recording&#8217;. I read an interview where he said he wanted his records  to sound like Gary Bonds&#8217; &#8216;Quarter to Three&#8217; &#8211; like they were recorded in a bathroom on the moon and nearly drowned out by the house party going on outside the door. If an artist&#8217;s ideal sound quality is that of his youth &#8211; crappy car radios, cheap portables and muddy pa&#8217;s in local bars &#8211; then maybe remastering isnt really relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/musicclub/?p=449#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Fopp in Manchester is even bigger than the London one:) Lots of remastered CD offers there at the moment.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Fopp in Manchester is even bigger than the London one:) Lots of remastered CD offers there at the moment.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/musicclub/?p=449#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Live / Dead, Grateful Dead HDCD remaster.  My vinyl transfer digitally spliced into one continuous concert IS WAY BETTER than this Warner Brothers official POS.

Doesn&#039;t even sound like the same band and the sad part is I would have purchased the CD if it sounded better than what I did.

WB, you think they have the master tapes.  I could have done a better CD mastering job than the nitwit at the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live / Dead, Grateful Dead HDCD remaster.  My vinyl transfer digitally spliced into one continuous concert IS WAY BETTER than this Warner Brothers official POS.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t even sound like the same band and the sad part is I would have purchased the CD if it sounded better than what I did.</p>
<p>WB, you think they have the master tapes.  I could have done a better CD mastering job than the nitwit at the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Waller</title>
		<link>http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/sound/sound-quality/cd-remasters-whats-been-your-most-disappointing-and-your-best/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Waller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bowers-wilkins.com/musicclub/?p=449#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this...turns out there is one in Manchester. I&#039;ll check it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this&#8230;turns out there is one in Manchester. I&#8217;ll check it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
