B &W Bowers & Wilkins

Policy statement : Please read our comments policy before posting.

Is Studio Recording Killing Music?

Posted on Tuesday, 17 February 2009    Comments (48)

Sparked on by a love of classic record producers such as Phil Spector, Joe Meek, and Sam Phillips, Bowers & Wilkins got together a panel of musical experts to see what they had to tell us about music and sound reproduction. Producers, musicians, and people at the very heart of the music industry, we asked them what exactly it is a producer does – and why modern music on CD doesn’t always sound as good as it could.
Download the MP3 of this discussion
Subscribe to the podcast
At the head of the table, and chairing the meeting was Martyn Ware, a sound pioneer and member of Heaven 17 and the Human League, who also has an impressive collection of production credits including the massive-selling Introducing the Hardline According to Terence Trent D’Arby
Steve Levine is well known in the music industry for producing hit albums for the likes of Culture Club and Westworld. But he was also the engineer on early Clash recordings, and has presented an excellent BBC Radio 2 show on the art of record production.
KK has produced music from the likes of Tim Booth and Natalie Imbruglia, and worked on film scores by such big names as Society of Sound Fellow James Newton Howard’s soundtrack for Collateral. He’s also recorded an album of children’s music with Sophie Barker of Zero 7 – which is much loved by parents and toddlers.
2 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?

Simon Gogerly is a renowned mix engineer, who has worked on a number of Hip-Hop and R&B remixes for artists such as Missy Elliot, Busta Rhymes, Lil’ Kim, Rakim, Mase, Jamiroquai and Simply Red. He also won a Grammy at the 2006 Grammy Awards for his work on U2’s album “How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb”.

Jim Irvin is the former singer with the band Furniture, and is now a songwriter signed to Warner Chappell. He’s also a journalist, and is a regular contributor to Mojo and Word magazines.
Steve Sasse is Head of A&R at Atlantic Records, and is therefore involved heavily in the partnering of musicians with producers. He has worked with Paolo Nutini, James Blunt, Leftfield, Razorlight and the Propellerheads.

What is a producer?

image2 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?

The role of the record producer equates closely to that of a film director – albeit with original connotations of actually producing the finished product, records. It is their job to get the best out of the musicians/actors and make the creative vision these people have into something that the rest of us can enjoy.
Steve Levine explains how it works: “When a songwriter or a band say ‘how can we make it like this?’ You’re then trying to interpret their wish, their dream or aspiration”
It also appears as though the relationship between artists and producers have changed in recent years, and whereas once an artist had no concept of a production and was simply given a producer, so there’s much more of a two-way relationship, especially as many emerging artists have already laid down tracks at home using Pro Tools and even Garage Band.
image3 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?

KK claims that the producer maybe isn’t the magical figure he once was: “The studio is not this big mystery that it used to be. And there isn’t this kind of dogma and mystique surrounding how to record anymore.

 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?

Steve Sasse of Atlantic Records agrees, and says that when a band has already had some experience of recording, and has developed their own ‘sound’ he tries to encourage them to keep that sound with their debut ‘professional’ recordings, and find a producer who facilitates that. “James Blunt has an affinity to that kind of west coast American tradition,” he said. “And found a producer in Tom Rothrock that gave him that sound and you know, whether you like him or loath him, I think he has sort of achieved what he wanted to.”
It’s almost as though producers are doing their own A&R, and getting involved with new artists early on and taking that completed sound to the record label. Surely that can only be a good thing for the quality of the music we have to look forward to, but what about that other important matter: sound quality.

Sound quality in the modern age
Compression is an important, and controversial topic in modern music production, especially as far as people concerned about sound quality is concerned: how much influence does a producer have on the sound quality of modern music.image5 Is Studio Recording Killing Music? With recent debates over the boosted loudness of albums by Metallica and Lily Allen, mastering engineer Simon Gogerly was obviously well placed to discuss how mastering a record effects the quality of the sound the listener gets out of a hi-fi at the other end of the process!
The loudness wars seem to be affecting more and more artists, with Gogerly explaining how an increasing number of artists are coming back to him saying how they love the mix, but it isn’t as loud as some CDs they have, for example.

image6 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?“Because things are getting mastered so hot and compressed and limited so much, people are expecting to hear that when you are mixing their stuff as well. So it is colouring how you can mix something. I mean I personally am not such a big fan because you know it kind of, the reduction of the dynamic range of the track is just squashing out a lot of the space, that it’s nice to have in a track.”
This arms race towards loudness, as KK called it, seems to be taking priority over sound quality in a lot of modern masters, and seems to be a sticking point for the recording industry, when it comes to making great sounding releases. Steven Sasse explained how the record companies felt about it, and why it was prevalent: “It is a fear thing I think,” he says. “A band or a label or manager does not want their track to come on the radio and sound quieter than the track that was just on before it.”
However, while compression is a by-word for bad sound nowadays, Steve Levine pointed out to us that it was actually originally a very useful tool for producers, and some of the world’s finest music benefited from compression, including Phil Spector’s Wall of Sound and the Motown sound.
“Berry Gordy would specifically listen to his mixes in his office,” Steve explained. “He would have them cut on to an acetate and he would play them through a transistor radio to hear how they would sound on a radio and would then use mastering compressors in those days to make sure that they sounded as powerful as they would on radio. That is one of the big differences between certain CD reissues and your recollection of them in the vinyl world, they actually sound different because the engineers and producers who originally cut the records had a totally different approach, primarily because they could not get the level on the physical vinyl disk of the day.”
But today things are different, and the loudness war is resulting in albums where every track is produced like a radio friendly single, and it can be very fatiguing. image8 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?The latest Metallica album was a good case in point, and sparked off lots of debate, especially as the version available for download in the video game Guitar Hero was less compressed and therefore sounded better than the CD release!
And it’s not only heavy metal acts who strive for loudness, as Steve Levine explains, “One good example is Snow Patrol. I cannot listen to two tracks in a row from them. It is so loud and so in your face that my ears get fatigued by the time the first verse is coming of the next song. It is just too much.”

But it’s not all bad news, as artists such as Mercury Music Prize winning Elbow made a conscious effort not to use these kind of mastering techniques, image9 Is Studio Recording Killing Music?and it resulted in a top quality album that also sounds great on a quality hi-fi system.
As the band itself say, if you want to hear it louder, then turn your system up a bit. We couldn’t agree more.

[Post to Twitter] 


Is Surround Sound Worth It?

Posted on Thursday, 16 October 2008    Comments (29)

Bowers & Wilkins has hosted the latest in its series of sound debates at London’s Strongroom studios. This time the hot topic was surround sound, and how it compared to stereo. The round-table discussion was hosted by Martyn Ware, himself an advocate of multichannel audio through his company Illustrious, which uses three-dimensional sound imaging techniques and technologies to provide immersive sound environments.

Other panelists included the Editor of stereo institution Hi-Fi World, The Deputy Editor of What Hi-Fi and a former Pioneer product manager who was heavily involved in the first players capable of handling both the SACD and DVD-Audio multichannel music formats.

We expected there to be multiple opinions on a sound topic as contentious as surround sound and our panel of experts didn’t disappoint.

Martyn Ware (Musical innovator and sound artist)
“Stereo is a particularly ubiquitous format, which works for most situations. But it is far from impressive when you compare it with an equivalent that is deliberately mixed in surround.”

Dominic Dawes (Deputy editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound & Vision)
“Surround sound has very much succeeded in making people feel like they are in the cinema… I don’t know what it has really done beyond that for the average punter”

Andy Walter (Surround sound mastering engineer at Abbey Road Studios)
“The band are in front of you across three speakers. Bono is in the centre and you have The Edge and everything going on. But behind there is the ambience of being there at a gig with 80,000 people… it’s stereo plus!”

Click here to download an MP3 of the full discussion.

to download an MP3 of the full discussion

[Post to Twitter] 


Does Music Sound Better Today Than 30 Years Ago?

Posted on Monday, 4 August 2008    Comments (33)

(Martyn Ware discusses the huge changes in making and listening to music with a panel of experts in our exclusive podcast)

In a small recording studio in East London, four industry professionals – and passionate music fans – met with Martyn Ware to discuss this all important question. Given the huge technological advances enabling anyone to make an album in their bedroom that sounds as if it were recorded at state of the art studio, surely music does sound better today.

Listen to the podcast below to hear what they thought:

Podcast

article1 1 Does Music Sound Better Today Than 30 Years Ago?

Martyn Ware (Musical innovator and sound artist):
“The thrill of live music and the full dynamic range of it is something that you simply can’t get off the internet.”

Tom Dunmore (Brand director of Stuff magazine):
“I would say that the benefits that you get from the freedom of the internet and of iPod and MP3 devices is far greater than the loss you get in terms of quality.”

Rob Kelly (Strongroom Studios director and engineer):
“The majority of music produced in studios today sounds less good to my ears than they did 20-30 years ago.”

Stephen Budd ((Manager of producers, songwriters, Franz Ferdinand and many others):
“I’m looking forward to this period that’s gonna come when high quality audio is as easy to access as poor quality audio. And when that happens I think that will create it’s own demand.”

Tim Lawrence: (Senior lecturer in music culture and author)
“I think there has been an incredible democratisation of music through the spread of iPod technology and through the spread of MP3s.”

[Post to Twitter] 


The Art of Sound

Posted on Tuesday, 6 May 2008    Comments (2)

Discovering the Creative Potential of Audio

The premiere of the John Cage’s 4′33″ was given by David Tudor on August 29, 1952, at Woodstock, New York as part of a recital of contemporary piano music. The piece was composed for any instrument, or any combination of instruments. The score instructs the performers to remain silent during each of its three movements. “Tacet”. The experience of hearing the piece changes according to where it is performed, or recorded. The audience at its premiere reacted variously, some whispering to one another, some walking out. Rather than silence, the audience heard perhaps for the first time the sound of their environment, and the sound of themselves interacting with their environment.


The features of the sound world we inhabit have attracted more and more attention from artists and composers since the beginning of the 20th century. As new technologies, materials and activities become a part of our day to day existence, so the sound world changes. The project of Sound Art originally was to remark on these changes in our acoustic environment.

In 1913, the Italian futurist painter Luigi Russolo set out a manifesto for distinguishing the “inviolatable and sacred” world of music from the unpredictable world of sound in his treatise “The Art of Noises”. He called for artists to observe the noise of industry in their works, in the same way that his contemporaries were observing new modes of travel and warfare in their visual pieces.

Rather than silence, the audience heard perhaps for the first time the sound of their environment, and the sound of themselves interacting with their environment.  Our sensitivity to sound as human beings is immense, and like smell, it affects us powerfully.

Since then, Sound Art has begun not only to observe the acoustic environment, but to manipulate it.

Janet Cardiff’s 2001 work ‘Forty Part Motet’ is a recording of Thomas Tallis’ ‘Spem in Alium Nunquam Habui’ which is played back employing an individual loudspeaker for each voice.

The speakers are arranged in the round, and listeners are invited to climb inside the music. They can move between voices during the performance, favoring bass over tenor for example. They also hear the sound of the choir preparing, they catch fragments of the live audience’s discussions and movements as they enter the auditorium.

The experience is completely immersive.

Cathy de Monchaux's 'Sweetly The Air Flew Overhead, Battle no 4', which featured sound from Martyn Ware

Cathy de Monchaux's 'Sweetly The Air Flew Overhead, Battle no 4', which featured sound from Martyn Ware

“Our sensitivity to sound as human beings is immense, and like smell, it affects us powerfully.” The unconcious processing attributed by our brains to processing extremely important survival-influencing data has inevitably atrophied over the millenia, but how much of this latent power yet remains to be revealed?

In the Lab over the coming months we are going to be exploring why the experience of our sound world is so important, how and why it is going to change, and which technologies are driving these changes.

Through a series of interviews in audio and video, my blog entries, and these pieces I will be looking at both avant-garde and everyday ways in which sound can affect our lives. This month I talk to Cathy de Monchaux and Charlie Morrow about the part sound has played in their work.

Cathy de Monchaux is a sculptor living and working in London. Her sculptures frequently use materials such as glass, paper, metal and leather. Since 1988 she has shown internationally, frequently in America, and her work is part of public collections in the Tate Gallery London, the Hirshorn Museum Washington, and Albright Knox New York, amongst others.

On the podcast I discuss a project we collaborated on together with Vince Clarke at her home in Hoxton – you can hear some of the sounds that we used to accompany her sculptures in the Podcast.

Charlie Morrow, pictured here interacting with a heartbeat sensing machine.

Charlie Morrow, pictured here interacting with a heartbeat sensing machine.

Charlie Morrow is a conceptualist living and working in Chelsea, New York. He has been instrumental in developing the manipulation of sound for public spaces, events, commercial soundtracks and museum installations.

Charlie and I discuss how he came to work with sound, and how his work with sound will change in the future.

[Post to Twitter] 



Tweet This Post links powered by Tweet This v1.3.9, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.